Articles Tagged with SFSTs

In the realm of DUI law enforcement and prosecution, few studies have wielded as much influence as the 1998 San Diego Study and the resulting sobriety test data. 

This research, which aimed to validate the accuracy of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) at blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) of 0.08% and below, has shaped policies, informed court decisions, and influenced the training of law enforcement officers across the United States. 

However, to truly understand the impact and implications of this study, we must look beyond the surface-level conclusions and delve into the statistical framework that underpins its findings.

In the realm of DUI law enforcement and prosecution, few tools have garnered as much attention and controversy as Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs). 

These tests, designed to help law enforcement officers assess a driver’s level of impairment, have become a cornerstone of DUI investigations across the United States. 

However, their reliability and accuracy have long been the subject of debate among legal professionals, including judges, prosecutors, DUI defense lawyers, expert witnesses, and scientists.    

If you get pulled over for suspicion of DUI, law enforcement will likely administer a series of field sobriety tests to determine your level of impairment, if Standardized Field Sobriety Tests any.

The most common sobriety tests police officers administer are divided into three categories: physical coordination tasks, mental acuity assessments, and eye examinations.

Physical coordination tasks may include things like walking heel to toe in a straight line and standing on one leg for a certain period of time.

Contact Information