Criminal Law - Outline Part 4
By Collin B. Hardee
Download the PDF version of this outline
NC1st Degree Murder
- WPD (Willful/Premeditated/Deliberate) – Specific Intent to murder; can use intoxication/Mistake of Fact
- Enumerated Felony Murder – act causes a death regardless of felony committed
- In the perpetration or attempted perpetration of any arson, rape or a sex offense, robbery, kidnapping, burglary, or other felony committed or attempted with the use of a deadly weapon
- Specialty – thermo nuclear, biological weapon, chemical weapon; POISON, Lying in Wait, Imprisonment, Starving, Torture
DEFENSES: Insanity, Mistaken ID, Self-Defense, Heat of Passion (mitigates to manslaughter)
2nd Degree Murder
- Extreme Recklessness (R++) – killing caused by dangerous conduct and the offender’s obvious lack of concern for human life
- SBI (Serious Bodily Injury) – intent to inflict serious bodily injury
- NO WPD – an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable “heat of passion”
DEFENSES: insanity, Self-Defense
MUST prove D realized that his conduct posed a risk to human life
Willful – purposeful
Premediated – to think about beforehand
Deliberated – weight the facets of a choice or problem – if you deliberate, you automatically premediate b/c deliberating takes time
Voluntary Manslaughter
- Provocation – mitigates murder to voluntary manslaughter
- Heat of Passion
MUST BE:
- More than mere words
- Adultery and killing must be severely proximate
- Mere suspicion, belief, or knowledge is not enough
- No rekindling or “last straw” situation
- Reasonable Person – jury decides if RP in D’s situation would have responded as D did
- Can be re-provoked after cooling-off period if provocation is continuous – D “snaps”
Involuntary Manslaughter
- Ordinary Recklessness
- Nature of risk (magnitude)
- Awareness of risk
- Justifiability of risk
- Degree of deviation from reasonable behavior
- Must Prove:
- Acted unlawfully
- Proximate Cause
- Criminal Negligence
- Killing resulting from gross negligence
- More than ordinary negligence
DEFENSE: no crime if w/o negligence or recklessness
MPCMURDER
- Purposely – D’s conscious object to murder
- Knowingly – D was practically certain he’d murder
- Extreme Recklessness (R++) – D was reckless under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life
Manslaughter
- Reckless – substantial unjustified awareness of gross deviation from reasonable law-abiding person
- Conscious disregard of known risk
- Extreme Mental or Emotional Disturbance – homicide committed under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance (SUBJECTIVE) for which there is reasonable explanation or excuse (OBJECTIVE)
- Can be built up over time – allows cooling off period
- Victim doesn’t have to be source of stress
- Reasonable excuse
- From viewpoint of person in actor’s situation under circumstances as he believes them to be
- Words alone can be adequate
Negligent Homicide
- Disregard of a risk that D should have been aware of
- Substantial unjustifiable gross deviation from reasonable law-abiding person
- one is guilty if he kills another person, even accidently, during the commission or attempted commission of a felony
- causation limitation requires that the killing be in furtherance of the felony
- No Felony Murder if person who commits the homicide is a non-felon who is resisting the felony
- Proximate Causation Test – holds a felon responsible for the killing by a non-felon if the felon proximately caused the death / set in motion the events that lead to the death
- Provocative Act Doctrine – D held responsible for the death of another at the hands of a third party, if the basis for the charge is founded on provocative act doctrine, which is simply a form of reckless homicide
- Example: a felon recklessly provokes a victim to shoot in self-defense, killing an innocent bystander
1st degree murder - if you have intent to commit felony, attributes that intent to intent for murder – if felony is one of the enumerated felonies, then the M is 1st degree; if not, then it is 2nd degree
Limitations
- Enumerated:
- Arson
- Rape – sex crimes
- Burglary
- Robbery
- Kidnapping
- Inherently Dangerous:
- In the ABSTRACT, does the felony carry a high risk of death?
- AS APPLIED: look at felony in the particular case
- Merger Rule: the felony that forms the basis of the felony murder charge, must be a felony independent of the murder – if underlying felony is integral part of murder, it will merge
- a felony cannot be a predicate for felony murder unless the felony is legally distinct from the act of killing. In other words, if a felony by definition requires bodily harm or imminent threat of bodily harm, it can’t support felony-murder liability.
- Prevents the felony-murder rule from turning virtually any attack that culminates in death into automatic murder
- This is so as not to allow every assault to be elevated to felony murder – b/c lack mens rea
- Agency/In Furtherance of: felon is only responsible for homicides committed in furtherance of the felony
- Committed by felon, his agent, or someone under his control
- Police officer that killed another suspect did not count b/c the killing was against the felony
- Res Gestae: must be part of one continuous transaction
- Felony ends at break in chain of circumstances
- Does not distinguish felony murder, but MPC raises a presumption of “recklessness and indifference to human life”; EXTREME RECKLESSNESS R++
- If the D, during the commission or attempt of certain felonies
- Gross recklessness during a felony can be a predicate for felony murder
- Robbery
- Rape
- Deviate Sexual Intercourse by threat/force
- Arson
- Burglary
- Kidnapping
- Felonies escape
Misdemeanor
- Trespassory taking
- Severance of good from the owner
- Not only move goods but have them in his possession, if only for a moment
- And carrying away
- 4-6 inches is enough – slightest movement AWAY is sufficient (shifting position w/o moving away is not enough)
- DOES NOT have to be removed from possessor’s premise
- ANY assumption of control by D, however brief, satisfies this element
- w/o consent of the possessor
- if possession was taken lawfully, w/ consent, generally embezzlement
- w/ intent to permanently deprive the possessor of the property
- NOT REAL PROPERTY (land)
- knowing that they (taker) weren’t entitled to it
- specific intent crime
- mere temporary taking under circumstances in which the possessor is likely to regain possession does NOT satisfy element
- MUST BE CONCURRENCE BETWEEN MENTAL STATE (INTENT TO TAKE) AND TAKING OF PROPERTY
- Continuing Trespass Doctrine – when a person wrongfully takes possession of property, he commits a new trespass every moment possession is retained – if the D later forms the intent to steal, concurrence is met and the crime can be larceny
- If believe the property is yours, taking it back, regardless if really is yours or not, is not larceny
- “tree falls on land and person who cut it drags it off – not larceny; person leaves then comes back – larceny”
Felony
- in addition to one of the following:
- over $1,000
- was from the Person
- committed during burglary, breaking/entering
- explosive/incendiary device
- firearm
- record/paper from NC State Archive
- Criminal Defense
- DUI/DWI
- Drug Crimes
- Larceny, Embezzlement & Fraud
- Domestic Violence, Assault & Battery
- Chapter 15 - Criminal Procedure
- Super Lawyers
The Charlotte lawyers at Powers Law Firm PA are dedicated to compassionate legal representation, predicated on superlative knowledge, trial skills, and conscientious advocacy.
The gift of a legal education extends beyond a fulfilling way to earn a living. Omni autem cui multum datum.